|
@@ -121,17 +121,17 @@ cells in the input map. The <em>method=cubic</em> method determines the new valu
|
|
|
the cell based on a weighted distance average of the 16 surrounding cells in
|
|
|
the input map.
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
-The bilinear and cubic interpolation methods are most appropriate for
|
|
|
-continuous data and cause some smoothing. Both options should not be used
|
|
|
+The bilinear, cubic and lanczos interpolation methods are most appropriate for
|
|
|
+continuous data and cause some smoothing. These options should not be used
|
|
|
with categorical data, since the cell values will be altered.
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
-In the bilinear and cubic methods, if any of the surrounding cells used to
|
|
|
+In the bilinear, cubic and lanczos methods, if any of the surrounding cells used to
|
|
|
interpolate the new cell value are NULL, the resulting cell will be NULL, even if
|
|
|
the nearest cell is not NULL. This will cause some thinning along NULL borders,
|
|
|
-such as the coasts of land areas in a DEM. The bilinear_f and cubic_f
|
|
|
+such as the coasts of land areas in a DEM. The bilinear_f, cubic_f and lanczos_f
|
|
|
interpolation methods can be used if thinning along NULL edges is not desired.
|
|
|
These methods "fall back" to simpler interpolation methods along NULL borders.
|
|
|
-That is, from cubic to bilinear to nearest.
|
|
|
+That is, from lanczos to cubic to bilinear to nearest.
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
If nearest neighbor assignment is used, the output map has the same raster
|
|
|
format as the input map. If any of the other interpolations is used, the
|