Jeff Tang 2cdfbf0593 READMEs update hai 1 semana
..
README.md 2cdfbf0593 READMEs update hai 1 semana
create_reasoning_dataset.py 6815255595 folder struc refactoring hai 3 semanas
create_sft_dataset.py 6815255595 folder struc refactoring hai 3 semanas
requirements.txt 99ead57fb6 4 READMEs; requirements hai 3 semanas
train_loss.png a6f7d02c17 train loss update hai 2 semanas
train_loss_cot.png a6f7d02c17 train loss update hai 2 semanas
trl_sft.py caf98ec76d unified script supporting 6 FT configs - quantized or not, peft/fft, cot or not (except q fft) hai 2 semanas

README.md

Enhancing Text-to-SQL with CoT: A Fine-Tuning Approach with Llama

This folder contains scripts to:

  • generate a dataset from the BIRD TRAIN set (with no CoT info) for supervised fine-tuning (SFT);
  • generate a dataset from the BIRD TRAIN set (with CoT info by Llama 3.3 70B) for SFT;
  • SFT the Llama 3.1 8B model with the generated datasets with different fine-tuning combinations: with or without CoT, using quantization or not, full fine-tuning (FFT) or parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT).

Note: CoT stands for Chain of Thought and we will use "CoT" and "reasoning" interchangeably here, although generally, reasoning encompasses a broader concept than CoT.

Eval Results of the Fine-tuned Models

The eval results of SFT Llama 3.1 8B with different options (epochs is 3, with an additional 10 for the two FFT models) are summarized below:

Fine-tuning Combination Accuracy
Non-Quantized, CoT, PEFT 43.35%
Quantized, CoT, PEFT 42.89%
Non-Quantized, CoT, FFT 42.44% (43.87% for 10 epochs)
Non-Quantized, No CoT, PEFT 39.31%
Quantized, No CoT, PEFT 39.31%
Non-Quantized, No CoT, FFT 36.31% (38.27% for 10 epochs)
Quantized, CoT, FFT N/A
Quantized, No CoT, FFT N/A

The table above shows that:

  1. The CoT FFT/PEFT model (with or without quantization) outperforms the no CoT FFT/PEFT model (with or without quantization) by 3.5% to 6.1%.

  2. The non-quantized PEFT model (CoT or not) is slightly better than the non-quantized FFT model.

SFT with the BIRD TRAIN dataset (No Reasoning)

We'll first use the BIRD TRAIN dataset to prepare for supervised fine-tuning with no reasoning info in the dataset.

Using the TRAIN to prepare for supervised fine-tuning

  1. Get the TRAIN dataset:

    cd data
    sh download_train_unzip.sh
    
  2. Create the dataset

cd ../fine_tuning
python create_sft_dataset.py --input_json ../data/train/train.json --db_root_path ../data/train/train_databases

This will create train_text2sql_sft_dataset.json and test_text2sql_sft_dataset.json using the TRAIN set. Each line in the json files is in the conversation format ready for fine-tuning:

{"messages":[{"content":"You are a text to SQL query translator. Using the SQLite DB Schema and the External Knowledge, translate the following text question into a SQLite SQL select statement.","role":"system"},{"content":"-- DB Schema: <DB_SCHEMA>\n\n-- External Knowledge: <KNOWLEDGE_FROM_TRAIN>\n\n-- Question: <TEXT_QUESTION>","role":"user"},{"content":"<GOLD_SQL>","role":"assistant"}]}

SFT (No Reasoning)

First, you need to login to HuggingFace (via running huggingface-cli login and enter your HF token) and have been granted access to the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct model.

Then run one of the commands below (trl_sft.py has three command line parameters: --quantized, --peft, and --cot, all with true or false values):

python trl_sft.py --quantized false --peft true --cot false
python trl_sft.py --quantized false --peft false --cot false
python trl_sft.py --quantized true --peft true --cot false

Note that we don't recommend using the quantized version with FFT (--peft false).

After the fine-tuning completes, you'll see the fine-tuned model saved in one of the following folders, as specified in output_dir of SFTConfig in trl_sft.py:

llama31-8b-text2sql-fft-nonquantized-nocot
lama31-8b-text2sql-peft-nonquantized-nocot
llama31-8b-text2sql-peft-quantized-nocot

After running tensorboard --logdir ./llama31-8b-text2sql-fine_tuning you can open http://localhost:6006 to see the train loss chart like this:

Evaluating the fine-tuned model (No Reasoning)

First, set the model value in llama_eval.sh to be one of the fine-tuned model folders above, e.g.

YOUR_API_KEY='finetuned'
model='fine_tuning/llama31-8b-text2sql-fft-nonquantized-nocot'

Then run sh llama_eval.sh to evaluate the fine-tuned model. The accuracy on the BIRD DEV dataset is about 37.16%. This is a 165% improvement over the model before fine-tuning, which has an accuracy of about 14.02% on the same dataset - you can confirm this by comparing the fine-tuned model's accuracy above with the original model's accuracy by modifying llama_eval.sh to use the original model:

YOUR_API_KEY='huggingface'
model='meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct'

Then running sh llama_eval.sh to evaluate the original model.

SFT with the BIRD TRAIN dataset (With Reasoning)

Next we'll use the BIRD TRAIN dataset to prepare for supervised fine-tuning with reasoning info in the dataset. The goal is to see if we can improve the accuracy of the fine-tuned model by adding the reasoning info in the dataset.

Creating a reasoning dataset from the TRAIN dataset

The script create_reasoning_dataset.py is used to create a reasoning dataset from the TRAIN dataset by asking Llama 3.3 70B to generate the reasoning for each text question and its corresponding gold SQL. The intent is to use the reasoning dataset to fine-tune the Llama model to improve the accuracy of the generated SQL.

To run the script, use the following commands:

python create_reasoning_dataset.py --input_json ../data/train/train.json --db_root_path ../data/train/train_databases

This will create a text2sql_cot_dataset dataset and train_text2sql_cot_dataset.json in the conversation format ready for fine-tuning. Each example in the dataset is generated from the code snippet below:

prompt = f"""
-- DB Schema: {db_schema}
-- External Knowledge: {external_knowledge}
-- Text Question: {question}
"""
cot = {
    "messages": [
        {
            "role": "system",
            "content": "You are a text to SQL query translator. Using the SQLite DB Schema and the External Knowledge, generate the step-by-step reasoning and the final SQLite SQL select statement from the text question.",
        },
        {"role": "user", "content": prompt},
        {"role": "assistant", "content": reasoning},
    ]
}

The prompt for Llama 3.3 70B to generate the reasoning above is:

You are a text to SQL query translator. Based on the DB Schema and External Knowledge, given the Text Question Input and its Gold SQL Output below, generate the step-by-step reasoning to infer the Gold SQL Output from the Text Question Input.

-- DB Schema: {db_schema}
-- External Knowledge: {external_knowledge}
-- Text Question Input: {question}
-- Gold SQL Output: {gold_SQL}

Your response should be as follows:\n\n
Let me think through this step by step:\n\n1. First, I need to consider...\n2. Then...\n3. Next...\n...\n\nFinally, the SQL statement for the text question is:
```sql ...```\n

"""

SFT (With Reasoning)

Run one of the commands below:

python trl_sft.py --quantized false --peft true --cot true
python trl_sft.py --quantized false --peft false --cot true
python trl_sft.py --quantized true --peft true --cot true

Again we don't recommend using the quantized version with FFT.

After the fine-tuning completes, you'll see the fine-tuned model saved in one of the following folders, as specified in output_dir of SFTConfig in trl_sft.py:

llama31-8b-text2sql-fft-nonquantized-cot
lama31-8b-text2sql-peft-nonquantized-cot
llama31-8b-text2sql-peft-quantized-cot

The train loss chart should look like this:

Evaluating the fine-tuned model (With Reasoning)

First, set the model value in llama_eval.sh to be one of the fine-tuned model folders above, e.g.

YOUR_API_KEY='finetuned'
model='fine_tuning/llama31-8b-text2sql-fft-nonquantized-cot'

Then uncomment the line SYSTEM_PROMPT here in llama_text2sql.py to use it with the reasoning dataset fine-tuned model.

Now run sh llama_eval.sh, which will take longer because the reasoning is needed to generate the SQL. The accuracy this time is 43.37%, compared with 37.16% without reasoning. This is another 16% improvement over the model with fine-tuning without reasoning.