|
|
@@ -115,6 +115,16 @@
|
|
|
of the source code of the delivered HTML document.
|
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ This service should also encourage the users by techniques
|
|
|
+ of \enquote{gamification} to give as much
|
|
|
+ meta information about their formulae as possible:
|
|
|
+ \begin{itemize}
|
|
|
+ \item Which problem domain does the formula belong to, e.~g. \enquote{Euclidean geometry}, \enquote{analysis} or \enquote{calculus}?
|
|
|
+ \item Does the formula itself have a name, e.~g. \enquote{Pythagorean theorem}, \enquote{Fibonacci numbers} or \enquote{geometric series}?
|
|
|
+ \end{itemize}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ This information should be used to create a formula database.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\section{Significance}
|
|
|
For me as a Linux user, there no software that I can test and which
|
|
|
offers on-line, interactive math handwriting recognition. But the
|
|
|
@@ -141,6 +151,10 @@ Additionally, such a project might give researchers more time to
|
|
|
concentrate on the tasks they really want to do rather than spending
|
|
|
hours by learning \LaTeX{}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+One last reason why this thesis matters is the formula database that
|
|
|
+gets created by users. This database might be used in follow-up work,
|
|
|
+e.~g. a formula spotter for presentations or a math detector for speech.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
\section{Time schedule}
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
|
\item[70h] Literature research about on-line handwriting recognition
|
Martin Thoma