LaTeX-examples/documents/papers/write-math-paper/ch7-mfrdb-eval.tex

%!TEX root = write-math-ba-paper.tex

\section{Evaluation}

The optimized classifier was evaluated on three publicly available data sets:
\verb+MfrDB_Symbols_v1.0+ \cite{Stria2012}, CROHME~2011 \cite{Mouchere2011},
and CROHME~2012 \cite{Mouchere2012}.

\verb+MfrDB_Symbols_v1.0+ contains recordings for 105~symbols, but for
11~symbols less than 50~recordings were available. For this reason, the
optimized classifier was evaluated on 94~of the 105~symbols.

The evaluation results are given in \cref{table:public-eval-results}.

\begin{table}[htb]
    \centering
    \begin{tabular}{lcrr}
    \toprule
    \multirow{2}{*}{Dataset}  & \multirow{2}{*}{Symbols}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Classification error}\\
    \cmidrule(l){3-4}
              & & Top-1                 & Top-3                \\\midrule
    MfrDB       & 94 & $\SI{8.4}{\percent}$  & $\SI{1.3}{\percent}$ \\
    CROHME 2011 & 56 & $\SI{10.2}{\percent}$ & $\SI{3.7}{\percent}$ \\
    CROHME 2012 & 75 & $\SI{12.2}{\percent}$ & $\SI{4.1}{\percent}$ \\
    \bottomrule
    \end{tabular}
    \caption{Error rates of the optimized recognizer systems. The systems
             output layer was adjusted to the number of symbols it should
             recognize and trained with the combined data from
             write-math and the training given by the datasets.}
\label{table:public-eval-results}
\end{table}